Gregg Bennett; After my encounter with the fraudulent printer, Michael O'Heren,. I went to the local Speedy Print shop. I ordered 500 books to be printed, gave the franchise owner, Gregg Bennett, his required down payment. When the books were ready, I went to pick them up only to find numerous mistakes, miss prints etc. I refused to accept them and wanted my down payment back. Not only wouldn't Bennett return my money, he printed more books and sold them out of his franchise for $2.00 a book. I tried suing the jerk but every lawyer I went to turned me down because Bennett was a member of the Jaycees and the community poster boy.   

   Michael O'Heren and Thomas Moorhead;

  If one could combine the morals, character, backbone and self respect of these three sickos together you wouldn't have enough to make a cockroach. After O'Heren ripped me off, I went to a Lawyer, Thomas Moorhead, a couple of years later I find that O'Heren and Moorhead are a little more than just friends, on Oct.7Th,1991, Tommy took Mikey to court and got a default settlement of $6,207.30, because O'Heren didn't show up. After several more payouts for Subpoenas, (Mikey never payed up either), I decided to let it go and get on with my business. Then in 1996, & 97, Moorhead sends out more Subpoenas, I go to the court house just to find that no-one is there, not even Moorhead, I figured it was all just lover quarrels. When about the first of Sept.,96, O'Heren calls me and tells me he gave Moorhead, $2,800.00 and he wasn't going to give me one cent. I called Moorhead about it, he denied it and sent me a letter dated Sept.5Th., accusing me of contacting O'Heren asking him to pay me directly. I immediately filed a complaint with the Attorney Grievance Commission. Oct., 17Th, 96, a Investigative Assistant at the Attorney Grievance Commission mailed a form to the court clerk who ignored it. Jan.,31St.,1997, the investigator sends the same form, stamped, >SECOND REQUEST<, stating, Please provide the following: (1) A certified Copy of the Docket Entries in the case entitled: Byron Eldridge v. Michael B. O'Heren, Case No. 91-16472-GC. I'm told the Honorable Judge Lostracco told the Clerk to ignore that request also. More subpoenas, more no-shows, more money Moorhead says I owe him. March 14Th, 1997, I write Moorhead a letter, firing him as my attorney. (see exhibit A) Around the 1st. of April 1998 I find out what Moorhead is up to, I get a Civil Pre-Trial order from Lostraccos circuit court signed April 9th. stating that a session was held at the courthouse on that day and a mediation is scheduled for September 1998. with a settlement conference/trial scheduled for 11/2/98. with a jury trial set to commence on 11/12/98. Confused? me too. It seems Tommy is suing me for no less than $3,000,000.00. I go to the pre-trial?, I asked the judge if I can have a jury trial, he said yes that Mr. Moorhead would help me with that, send me forms etc. After the hearing, not trusting Moorhead for anything, I went across the hall to the court secretaries office where she helped me fill out and file the forms for a jury trial. I go to the court house to look up some records I thought I could use, I asked the records clerk, Trudy Mills (pg.19), for a particular record and she says just a minute, she called the Sheriffs Department and had them send Deputy Garica over. Garica explained that judge Lostracco ordered Trudy to call him every-time I came in the court house. Deputy Garcia, who I have known for years, is Lupe Garcia's uncle and is by far the most decent man on the Sheriff's department. Lostracco meant for Garcia's presence to be a major source of intimidation to me. How could he possibly think there could be a good Mexican, especially one related to the two who intimidates him the most, Frank and Lupe Garcia (pg.17)

   Sept.,23rd.,1998; I get a summons to appear for what I thought was a mediation hearing, that I guess ended up as a non jury trial. I go to the courthouse for the mediation with a pair of scissors and a roll of tape in a clear plastic bag, and a letter explaining why I had tape over my mouth. Deputy Garcia met me outside the mediation room and said Judge Lostracco had ordered him to search me, after the search Deputy Garcia told me that the Judge would consider the scissors a weapon and would have me put in jail. I had planned on putting the tape over my mouth when I entered the court room, instead, I gave deputy Garcia the letter explaining everything and left. A week or so later I get a court paper stating, Defendant filed late, one page statement and refused to speak. Had tape over mouth. Not only did I NOT enter the court room at all but they lie saying I had tape over my mouth and refused to speak. One of the Lawyers or Judges was Richard Burlingame, who was also the attorney for the O'Heren estate. I still don't know if that was a trial or what it was supposed to be.

         About Sept,26th; I get a court document stating. The mediation panel evaluates this case as follows, $3,345.00 to plaintiff for Attorney fees, $15,000.00 for Defamation. $18,345.00 total to plaintiff. I guess it must have been a lawsuit for past attorney fees and a civil trial wrapped up in one. On December 4Th., A after trial Judgement is made out by somebody, most likely Lostracco, but he's getting a little nervous by now and don't want his name on anymore documents like this one.. $3,345.00 Damages, $312.64 interest and $167.00 costs. Judgement $3,824.64. Following is what Moorhead claimed in damages and what he thinks he should be awarded by the court.

     DAMAGES: The obvious damage is for unpaid attorney fees in the sum of $3,345.00 which reflects exactly what was billed. The damage to plaintiff's reputation is substantial and in his Complaint he is seeking $3,000,000.00. Plaintiff will be able to substantiate damages well in excess of the Defendant's ability to ever pay the same. MEDIATION AWARD: Plaintiff submits that a substantial award should be awarded so that the Defendant understands that he cannot continue to make Libelous and Slanderous statements about the Plaintiff as he continues to do as set forth in his Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto. Following is my answer to Plaintiff's (Moorheads) complaint and exhibit A;

    Actually I wrote the following letter to Moorhead, in answer to a letter he had sent me, complaining that I hadn't replied to the summons requesting information that I couldn't get from the records office and/or information that never existed in the first place.

     I waited this long before I decided to answer this summons because I first called the 35Th, Jud. court sec. She could only tell me to get an attorney and she couldn't give me legal advice. So I called several attorneys in the greater Flint area and they said I should file with the court or I was in big trouble. I can't afford an attorney and I don't know what to do or say. If I'm supposed to do something I guess the judge will tell me what that is. If I'm supposed to say something or give my opinion I can only refer to Moorheads exhibit "A" where I accuse him of lying. I think he's lying now too. I'm also beginning to think his sanity should be looked into as well as his character. About suing me. No. 10 of the complaint - Trudy Mills should have told her boss, not Moorhead. I hope this satisfies No. 2 on the summons and complaint form and the court don't say I have to give some lunatic $3,000,000.00. sorry this is such a mess but I can't afford a secretary right now either.....I've corrected the spelling to make this more readable, the original had a lot of misspelled words and was written in my most sloppy, careless handwriting, trying to convey a very bad attitude on my part.

                                                                                           EXHIBIT "A"

     Dear Mr. Moorhead:   I am hereby informing you that you are not my attorney any more on the above-mentioned matter. After going over court records on case # 91-16472-GC, I have found that you have been charging me for subpoenas for Mr. O'Heren to disclose his assets which you have never followed up on. You have made personal deals with Mr. O'Heren and his attorney to collect what mainly amounts to you're outrageous fee without your even knowing what Mr. O'Heren's assets are. You've charged me several times for subpoenas being served, but have never forced Mr. O'Heren to comply in any way, so how can you expect me to believe that you are working in my best interest? As far as any charges from your office, I will not pay you one cent until I have sent my newly discovered information and court records along with the letters and charges you have sent me to the Attorney Grievance Commission and they notify me as to whether your conduct in this matter is honest or even legal for that matter. I feel you have lied to me, extorted money from me under false pretenses, and have not acted in my best interest at all.

     Hard to believe that a state can operate like this. Fire a crooked Lawyer and he can sue you for it. Lawyers and Prosecutors can legally use threats on witnesses lives to force plea-bargains and settlements, (pg8), Judges can get murderers off (20) and make (pg.9) rulings that it's OK for the police to lie in open court and on criminal complaints.

    Click here (13)   On-Star, installed in all automobile wiring harnesses since 1990, rather you subscribe to the service or not all any gov. agency, police dept., court personal, attorney or any-one that wants to pay for the info has to do is go to any of the above, pay the court clerk, judge, cop etc. to access On-Star, type in a VIN number and track your automobile with all the precision of the GPS satellite systems. Cops use it to set people up, track there wives and for entertainment, (bait car). Attorneys use it for many things, divorce cases, civil suits, industrial spying, that list is endless. Is it any wonder why the gov took over G.M.?. Fact is the government takeover of G.M. has been in the works since the conception of On-Star.